Police, IGP And The Rivers Politics

The Local Government Areas (LGA) election in Rivers State concluded peacefully, marking a significant contrast to the chaos often associated with elections in Nigeria. Despite the absence of law enforcement officers, the election was devoid of the violence that typically plagues such events.
However, the most striking aspect of this election was the deliberate interference by the Inspector General of Police (IGP), whose actions were nothing short of disgraceful. The IGP’s involvement in Rivers politics was not only unnecessary but also highly unprofessional. Governor Sir Siminalayi Fubara openly accused the IGP of attempting to sabotage the election by instructing citizens to abandon their civic duty and go about their normal daily activities. This directive was seen as a clear attempt to derail the democratic process in the state. However, the people of Rivers State refused to be cowed by the IGP’s ill-advised orders and instead chose to follow the leadership of their governor.
By defying the IGP and aligning with Governor Fubara, the people of Rivers sent a powerful message. Their actions underscored their unwavering loyalty to the governor and showcased a blatant disregard for the IGP’s interference. This raises serious questions about the role of the IGP, who seemed more interested in undermining the democratic will of the people than ensuring the election was conducted fairly. The IGP’s actions during the Rivers election were not only irresponsible but also a blatant abuse of his position. His attempts to disrupt the election appeared politically motivated, further fueling speculation about the undue influence of former Governor Nyesom Wike, who is widely believed to have the IGP under his control. This pattern of behavior suggests that the IGP is more interested in serving the political interests of a few than upholding the law.
Throughout the election, it became clear that the IGP was overstepping his bounds. His actions were not only a violation of his professional responsibilities but also an insult to the office of the governor. By attempting to dictate the actions of the people of Rivers State, the IGP acted as though he was the governor himself. Such overreach was rightly resisted by the people, who refused to be bullied into submission. The peaceful conduct of the election, in spite of the police absence, further highlights the problematic nature of IGPs interference. It now seems evident that much of the violence and unrest often seen on election days is artificially created by law enforcement officers acting in their own interests.
In the case of Rivers State, the absence of the police allowed for a peaceful and orderly process, suggesting that law enforcement may, in fact, be part of the problem rather than the solution. The IGP’s actions have been met with widespread condemnation, both in Rivers State and beyond. Many are calling for him to issue a public apology, particularly to Governor Fubara and the people of Rivers. His behavior was not only unwise but also damaging to the credibility of the Nigerian Police Force. The reputation of the force, already tainted by years of corruption and incompetence, has been further eroded by the IGP’s conduct during this election.
Internationally, the IGP’s actions have cast a dark shadow on the image of Nigerian law enforcement. The world is watching, and the IGP’s attempts to meddle in a democratic election have raised serious concerns about the professionalism and ethics of Nigeria’s police force. His behavior has embarrassed the nation on the global stage and cast doubt on Nigeria’s commitment to free and fair elections. The damage inflicted by the IGP’s actions extends far beyond the borders of Rivers State. His interference has tarnished the reputation of the Nigerian Police in the eyes of the international community, raising questions about the competence of the country’s law enforcement. This is a significant blow to Nigeria, which has struggled to shake off its image as a country rife with corruption and lawlessness.
Given the magnitude of his misconduct, many have called for the IGP’s immediate resignation. His failure to act professionally during the Rivers election has irreparably damaged public trust in the police force. Resignation would be the most honorable course of action and could help to restore some level of confidence in an institution that has lost its way under his leadership. The role of law enforcement in elections is crucial. Officers are supposed to maintain peace and ensure that the democratic process is respected. Unfortunately, the IGP’s actions in Rivers State have demonstrated that he is more interested in political gamesmanship than in fulfilling his duty. His behavior raises serious doubts about his ability to lead the Nigerian Police Force with integrity.
The Nigerian Police Force has been tainted by the actions of its leader, and the question now is, how it can redeem itselfs. The IGP’s disgraceful conduct has left a stain on the institution, and it will take significant effort to repair this damage. Some have suggested that a complete overhaul of the police leadership is necessary to restore its credibility, starting with the immediate removal of the IGP. In the aftermath of the election, the people of Rivers State have turned to prayer, seeking divine intervention in the hope that the IGP might develop a conscience. This call for spiritual reflection speaks to the deep frustration and anger felt by the people, who believe that the IGP’s actions were an outright betrayal of their trust. His behavior has been nothing short of an abuse of power.
Governor Siminalayi Fubara, on the other hand, has emerged from this episode with his authority strengthened. The unwavering support of the people during this crisis has solidified his position as a leader who can unite his people in the face of external challenges. His calm and steady leadership throughout this ordeal stands in stark contrast to the reckless and unprofessional conduct of the IGP. The peaceful conclusion of the Rivers State LGA election is a testament to the power of the people. Despite the IGP’s attempts to undermine the process, the citizens stood firm and ensured that their voices were heard. This is a powerful reminder that democracy can prevail when the people refuse to be swayed by external pressures.
In conclusion, the Inspector General of Police has proven himself to be unfit for his position. His actions during the Rivers election were not only unprofessional but also deeply damaging to the reputation of the Nigerian Police Force. The IGP’s conduct has raised serious concerns about the integrity of law enforcement in Nigeria, and his continued presence in office is a liability. To restore public trust and repair the damage he has done, the IGP must be removed from his position without delay.
– David Oguzierem, is the Chairman of Rivers Defense Alliance (RIVDAL).